Archive for March 13th, 2009

And now for something completely different… a non-rant post O_O

My desktop PC’s case is a Thermaltake Xaser VI MX which, while it looks pretty and is nice to work with, does not have the quietest fans. The most recent Atomic magazine has woken me up to the multitude of cheap fan controllers, and because more (preferably LED-lighted) cooling fans would relatively inexpensive (and hassle and power-tool-free) way to add more orsm to my case. This will also inevitably add noise as the vibrations are tranferred to the case (rubber mounts are an option but do not completely eliminate noise and are more money to spend). In addition, I don’t really need my hard disks running below room temperature except on hot days (like the ridiculous 45+ degree days we’ve had this summer) so a fan-controller could be a good addition.

No Comments

EPIC RAGING RANT TIEM! THIS IS FUCKING RETARDED!!!

In quick succession, there are 2 more news articles that further reduce my faith in *any* australian government.

This and this are what I am talking about.

Now, I’m NOT FUCKING SURE HOW HARD THIS IS TO UNDERSTAND CONROY. HOW IS THIS A SCARE CAMPAIGN?

The filter

  1. Has no judicial oversight or appeal
  2. The blacklist is maintained by an unaccountable government-controlled body?
  3. You cannot opt-out of this mandatory filter

THESE ARE FACTS! I DO NOT LIKE THESE FACTS. I AM NOT TRYING TO SCARE ANYBODY, JUST TELL THE TRUTH BEHIND YOUR AND CHAIRMAN RUDD’S LITTLE MORAL CRUSADE AGAINST THE INTERNET.

Sorry Conroy Conjob, I can’t have any faith in you filter while you continue to ignore these 3 very valid facts.

It doesn’t help that while you claim that the xFOADx’s anti-abortion page submission was not about political speech, you can’t argue that ACMA’s takedown request wasn’t. There is NO FUCKING REASON TO TAKE DOWN A LINK, BECAUSE IF YOUR FILTER WORKS, PEOPLE WON’T BE ABLE TO GET TO THE PAGE ANYWAY, RIGHT? OH, RIGHT… YOU KNOW THAT THE FILTER WON’T WORK…

, , , , ,

1 Comment

I just realised how stupid some people are…

During a energy-drink fueled all-nighter I had a great idea for a blog post. But I forgot what I was going to write. Here is what I remember: The law is does NOT stop people breaking the law. It seems obvious, but some people don’t seem to realise it (I’m looking at you Clive Hamilton, Conjob, Jim Wallace and Michael Atkinson). Just because there’s a law about something does *not* mean that people CAN’T break it. The point of laws is not to prevent people breaking them. That is the point of criminal courts. The laws themselves are not meant to stop people breaking them. If that was the case, we wouldn’t need the courts for criminal trials. So, making a law like this: “Video Games (that would be) rated R18+ cannot be sold in Australia” or “ISPs must prevent their customers accessing illegal/unwanted content” MISS THE ENTIRE POINT OF HAVING LAWS. Yes, laws can be broken, but that is the responsibility of the one who breaks them and there are consequences for it. THAT is the point of laws.

, , , , , ,

No Comments